ANVISA GMP GUIDELINES EPUB

adminComment(0)
    Contents:

Guidance documents and FAQs. FAQ - APIs (English) · FAQ - APIs (English) - pdf · Guidance document - Degradation profiles of drug products (Portuguese). This guide is based on documents VOLUME 9A of The Rules Governing Medicinal. Products in the European Union – Guidelines on Pharmacovigilance for. 1 Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA), Brasilia, DF, Brazil, . Furthermore, poor compliance with GMP guidelines lead to transparency /publicdisclosure/glossaryofacronymsandabbreviations/ucmpdf.


Anvisa Gmp Guidelines Epub

Author:CHRISTENA AMSPAUGH
Language:English, Japanese, Arabic
Country:Romania
Genre:Art
Pages:124
Published (Last):14.06.2016
ISBN:243-6-57471-794-1
ePub File Size:20.80 MB
PDF File Size:18.28 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Registration needed]
Downloads:28894
Uploaded by: HUMBERTO

Manufacturing Sites subject to GMP. Certification party auditing organization recognized by Anvisa;. • V – by making a risk analysis to assess. Harmonization of GMP guidelines and inspection procedures are the key steps to avoid . Deficiencies often found during ANVISA inspections (article of Brazilian .. /publicdisclosure/glossaryofacronymsandabbreviations/ucmpdf. Anvisa regulatory guidelines High Impact List of Articles PPts Journals You Mie Lee Cell signalling and Biochips PPT Version | PDF Version GMP deficiencies found by ANVISA in foreign inspections. Andrea Geyer, Varley D Sousa.

For generic and similar drugs, drug scientific evaluation includes their equivalence to the brand name drug from the viewpoint of quality, efficacy, and safety, proved by bioequivalence studies, as in other agencies [ 7 — 9 ]. After evaluation, the registration application can be approved and questioned through major objections, when deficiencies that can be solved are identified, as other noncritical issues that require clarification, or refused, when regulatory requirements are not accomplished [ 1 ].

The rejection is a disadvantage to the applicant, who may have to review the entire process or even redevelop the product, in case the decision has reached final instances and no further appellations are allowed, to ANVISA, who spent public resources reviewing the applications, and mostly to society, which will not have access to an alternative treatment with guaranteed quality, safety, and efficacy.

Moreover, scientific assessment carried on rejected applications is not published, and it prevents the study of the most important factors associated with refusal reasons. In this note, a retrospective analysis of the main reasons for marketing authorization refusal of generic and similar pharmaceutical drug products in Brazil is presented.

Register for a free account

The aim is to publish useful information for future applications, so that processes can be better prepared and time required for analysis reduced. Material and Methods A retrospective search of approved and refused drug products registration processes was performed on the Government Official Gazette GOG from January 1, , and December 31, GOG publishes brief information about process, as company name, drug product name and its API, and presentations including dosage form, strengths, container closure types, and configurations.

ANVISA databank is an internal software which contains information about drug products, that is, their applicants, application date, and motivation reports for approval or refusal. After data review, refusal reasons were classified as administrative nontechnical or scientific technical , categorized in general areas and further subdivided and detailed in specific categories, according to subjects described on particular regulatory regulations.

Results Between January 1, , and December 31, , new, generics, and similar pharmaceutical drug products applications were published on Government Official Gazette. Any new drug product was refused. Six of them referred to clone petitions, simplified application linked to a matrix petition, which contains all technical and clinical information requested for drug product registration. Clone is based on a matrix petition and they differ exclusively in drug product name, packaging layout, and legal information [ 10 ].

Retrieved processes were submitted between and Major nontechnical refusals occurred on documents applied on and Figure 1. Figure 1: Number of refused marketing authorization applications in accordance with process submission year.

The retrospective analysis revealed reasons for refusal. Each reason was classified in general areas according to major themes described in registration regulations and detailed in specific categories [ 7 , 8 ] Table 1. Table 1: Distribution of main reasons for refusal to approve generic and similar pharmaceutical drug products. Drug product quality control was the main reason for registration refusal.

Analytical method validation problems, related to quality control, involved lack of specificity, linearity, accuracy in assay, dissolution, and impurity methods. Main reasons related to API quality control were also analytical validation problems including absence of validated analytical method for impurities assay and lack of specificity in impurities analytical method. The topic related to impurities represented an important registration reason for refusal, which was related not only to drug product quality control but also to drug analytical method validation or verification, drug stability and photostability, and API quality control performed by drug product manufacturer and API manufacturer, as represented in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Distribution of problems related to impurity which led to refusal of marketing authorization application for generic and similar pharmaceutical products. Between and , 80 new drug products were not approved in the USA: 76 Pignatti et al.

Quality major objections were related to API quality control In Europe, major objections are sent to the applicant during the review. Applicants have to accomplish them in a predetermined period of time [ 16 ]. The process is essentially the same in Brazil [ 17 ].

Failure to solve all major objections may lead to a refusal. The same does not happen in Brazil. There is also an instrument to being withdrawn [ 18 ] but it is not as representative.

Application submission procedure was established in [ 17 ], detailed in [ 19 ] and [ 20 ] through orientations. Therefore, a possible explanation for the persistency of nontechnical refusals would be that although regulatory requirement was available, it was not applied as they should be, neither by companies nor by ANVISA. The procedure began to be better applied only after both orientations [ 19 , 20 ]. In , a preliminary analysis procedure was determined, by which a screening approach should briefly review all applications received, checking if it was sufficiently complete to permit a substantial review.

Hence, transparency actions as this one are strongly encouraged, so new processes are submitted in accordance with guidelines.

FDA also has established some requirements to refuse submissions that are not sufficiently complete to permit substantive review [ 21 ]. Repairing an incomplete file during the analysis is a waste of resources, because it needs many cycles of FDA response and applicant repair [ 13 ].

Apart from this, deadline accomplishment, a nontechnical reason, was the third major reason of refusal, mainly due to absence of clone drug product petition.

Clone drug product is identical to another one, named matrix petition, differing exclusively in name and labeling [ 10 ]. It was a particular situation in the year , due to deadline established by regulation to clone adequacy. It will not happen in the next years [ 10 ].

This data reinforces the importance of transparency initiatives to ameliorate technical quality of national drug products and expand internal and international generic and similar drugs market. Table 2: Obligations of an application. Drug product quality control problems had the highest occurrence For pharmaceutical drug products registration, quality, safety, and efficacy for the proposed use have to be recognized through scientific evidence and analysis [ 1 ] using established methods accepted by ANVISA [ 28 ].

When a specific analytical method is not described in any official pharmacopeia accepted by ANVISA, it has to be validated [ 7 , 8 , 29 ].

You might also like: DIE FURCHT DES WEISEN EPUB

In USA, the concept is similar [ 30 ]. Since then, there are regulatory requirements for this theme which are not yet fully accomplished. Brazilian regulation is also quite similar with ICH guideline. The main difference is robustness requirement and precision parameter relative standard deviation [ 32 ]. However, such differences do not justify the large number of rejections on this subject.

Regulatory requirements establish which parameters must be validated, but they do not bring detailed descriptions of how to perform the assays. We believe such absence may be the main reasons to stand validation as one of the most common reasons for refusal. The validation procedure is an important step of method development [ 33 ] and it has to be suitable for each product [ 32 ].

Main challenge for a method validation may not be the method development itself rather the experiments planning and results interpretation based on proper statistical analysis. An iconic representation of this may be found in one of the process submitted in in which specificity was not proved for both assay and impurity test.

The regulatory requirement states that specificity should be conducted during the validation of identification tests for the determination of impurities and the analyte [ 29 ]. For the analyte assay and impurity test, specificity can be determined comparing the results obtained on samples spiked with appropriate levels of impurities or excipients, with unspiked samples, to demonstrate that the results are unaffected by the presence of these materials.

When a possible impurity is not available, it is necessary to perform forced degradation tests [ 29 ].

In the example depicted here, impurities standards were not available, and the absence of forced degradation test was not justified, demonstrating lack of proper experiment planning and noncompliance with regulatory requirement, consequently. Hence, the necessity of training programs is evident [ 33 ].

Drug product stability study was the second main reason for marketing authorization refusal. It is an obligatory study for drug product registration [ 7 , 8 ]. Stability first regulation from had already discussed the importance of tests to effectively assess the dosage form, including assay, impurity, and dissolution.

In addition, it established that evaluation methods should be validated and stability-indicating [ 34 ]. It brings some obligatory tests or the possibility for justifying its absence.

Nonetheless, results demonstrated that despite the increased rigidity of the current legislation, it has been published for more than 10 years, so it is still lagging when compared to the Stability ICH guidelines [ 36 ]. Even so, some refusals motivations were already covered in the Brazilian legislation for 30 years. Moreover, many stability reasons are also related to analytical method, validation and development problems, as already discussed. Stability specifications have to be determined based on each drug product.

Dissolution methods and specification recommended by other regulatory agencies to methods not described in official compendia, as FDA-Recommended Dissolution Methods [ 37 ], cannot be applied without prior critical analysis, because they are not always suitable for Brazilian products. They are just aids of industry personnel development. API quality control, made by drug product manufacturer, is fourth main refusal reasons, after deadline accomplishment, already discussed.

BioMed Research International

Considering that the API quality is critical to drug product quality, it is essential that drug manufacturers assure and confirm that API accomplishes quality requirements. It means drug products manufacturers have to establish internal API quality control specifications and methodology.

Although this information is present in registration regulatory requirements, absence of API methodology development is still a failure point on drug registration.

Internal API quality control specifications and methodology should be adopted based on impurity profile and residual solvents arising from API manufacturer synthetic route, official compendia, and also international guidelines as ICH quality guidelines [ 36 ]. When a drug product is approved, an API manufacturer is also approved for that drug [ 7 , 8 ]. Therefore, API manufacturer has to comply with Brazilian regulatory requirements.

Within API manufacturer category, great part of denials corresponded to lack of stability studies performed on Brazilian climatic zone.

Related GMP News

Brazil is classified as IVb climatic zone [ 38 ]. It is mandatory to present complete accelerated stability studies and at least long term stability studies protocol in IVb climatic zone [ 39 , 40 ]. The problem is that many international API manufacturers refuse to comply with Brazilian regulation, as countries representing major consumer markets belong to climatic zones of milder conditions.

The design is simple, yet functional.

The intra-osseous part is blasted according to set standards to get a surface well adapted for osseointegration, without costly surface treatments.

For a trained clinician, the entire procedure can be performed in about an hour and the patient can leave the office with a well retained denture. As with all surgical procedures, the patient has to be instructed how to handle the new situation and controlled during the healing process to avoid jeopardizing the implants. Easier, Faster, Safer, Cheaper, and expectedly Better! Author Dr. All production processes are done in-house: 6, sqm campus, with over state-of-the-art CNC machines, tight control over production processes and product quality - all these guarantee the supply of high quality implants to the market.

All dental implants hold successful researches and clinical studies conducted by worldwide opinion leaders. All Ditron Dental Implants are surface treated with a pure cleaning process, using sand blasting and double acid etching. A wide range of prosthetic parts and surgical tools complete our system and allow both implantation and reconstruction accurately and safety.

A unique spherical helix thread assists accelerated osseointegration with minimal bone loss. Preserves a better proportion of bone and periosteum. For more information please contact www.

With a range of essential measures it meets clinical needs including the immediate loading , delayed and immediate post-extraction. The KRI implant has a prosthesis easily with a rational and functional prosthetic components. Unique analog and transfer for all measures implant, the internal hex is the same for all sizes, so the healing abutments screws are universal.

Future plans and produces for 30 years implant systems with an easy to use technology in order to offer different clinical and prosthetic solutions.

Synthegra laser treated surface. This treatment, internationally patented, satisfies two requirements at the same time: to reduce the risk of peri-implant infections and to promote osseointegration.

In fact, Synthegra is a smooth surface, able to obstacle bacterial adhesion and it acts like a rough surface, stimulating new bone formation. The microthreads in the crestal module extend into the body of the implant facilitating the vertical insertion of the screw and improving stability. The root of the implant is rounded, thus allowing better integration into the implant site and the highest tenderness towards the tissue. There are also four apical debridement burrs draining that facilitate screwing and collection of any bone chips left in the site.

Logic Plus was developed with the vision of providing affordable quality together with maintaining simplicity with only one prosthetic system for all diameters of implants. Applicable for placement in upper jaw and porous bone. Used in cases of minimal bone height. Superior for use in the posterior zone. The G-OSS macro and microstructured surface has osteoconductive properties to allow for a greater and more rapid osseointegration. The surface treatment performed on BNX EVO is made using a process developed in the GHIMAS laboratories, via large grit sandblasting followed by double acidification, which ensures optimum cleaning of the surface itself.

Visit our web site www. Easy insertion by double thread guidance at the implant external thread. Outstanding a healing with optimum apposition of the osteoblasts to the special nano-surface.

Anatomical root analog design for excellent cosmetic results. Possible platform switch at the transition between implant and abutment. A rationalized and systems. ItIt allows allows the the use use of of aa retaining retaining microgap screwof of1.

Discover online: www. All Implant Systems are characterized by a unique implant platform with tight sealed connection and equipped with the surgical screw and mount-transfer abutment, simplifying the prosthetic work. The double roughness surface treatment SLaDE Sand blasted Large-grit and acid Double Etched surface meets the requirements of faster loading times, and allows to operate successfully in poor quality bone.

The increase in micro-rough surface of the plant, obtained through a process of acid etching and sandblasting with alumina, developed with pore size of 2 microns.

In the upper section there is a microthreads which is very useful in cortical bone, which is not being subjected to stress, promotes the insertion of the implant bone crest in ensuring its immobility. This concept, combining Hexagon - locking taper, not only provides the basic bio mechanical features necessary for a physiological implant osseointegration, but gets an airtight seal at the crest level at the same time guaranteeing the absence of bone resorption.

In , was presented a study on the product which showed the high predictability of the results obtained with ImplaDent system.

None of the current treatment protocols for PI provide a definitive solution, i. Untreated PI can lead to dental implant removal and replacement.

Dental implant loss requires a lengthy healing process and the introduction of new, one or more, implants. Consequently, an expensive, time-consuming restoration replacement process follows the dental implant replacement.

The implant and the sleeve are pre-assembled during manufacturing in a configuration identical to a regular implant, thus assuring the insertion of the implant is similar to standard procedure. Once PI develops, the restoration is removed and the contaminated sleeve is extracted.

Implantswiss Dental Implant System is the most advanced stage in implant dentistry with its hybrid design, SLA surface, self-cutting edge, hexagon connection, switch platform and periodontologic neck design. Implantswiss is a strong and reliable brand in the industry with its innovative solutions; unique surface design and high quality. Every Implantswiss product comes with user-friendly packaging with smart pegs and the availability of the all-in-one-packages that include one multi abutment, one lab analog and one healing abutment in addition to the fixture.

Our objective is to increase brand awareness of our products with high quality and innovative solutions and become one of the global leaders of the implant market.

We are committed to deliver our customers innovative, precise, high quality and aesthetic solutions with our products manufactured with advanced Swiss technology and high precision. It is indicated in all bone classes; it has an outer morphology of conical shape but it has the peculiarity to offer a implant-prosthetic connection with double coupling: conometric and hexagonal.

This feature makes the connection extremely reliable due to the presence of a through screw tightening allowing at the same time a perfect bacterial seal. The production range has been gradually widened starting the fabrication of internal hex, external hex and MC connections. The horizontal and vertical set-off of the implant-abutment connection from the bone level, together with the implant mini-threads, contribute to the stability of the marginal bone and soft tissues surrounding the abutment.

State-of-the-art implant construction enables safe and precise insertion and optimized load distribution in the bone tissue. The high strength of the Q-Lock implant-abutment connection is ensured by a unique combination of deep cone, solid hexagon and reinforcing cylinder.

A single system organizer provides instruments for the insertion of implants with both tapered and straight design. The BioniQ implant system also includes a narrow implant with a diameter of 2. This enables the BioniQ system to also offer optimal solutions in situations where treatment with conventional dental implants is either problematic or completely impossible. Fundamental to this achievement is the cooperation with several prestigious national and international Universities.

The several published scientific articles demonstrate the revolutionary innovative solutions offered by the new engineering and manufacturing technologies applied. Such a technology allows the 3D computer design of the implants that are manufactured also custom-made tooth for the single patient with a tridimensional porous surface, which is absolutely new in the traditional implantology field.

This implant line was introduced in the market in after several in vitro and in vivo studies on animals and humans. So today we can state that TiXos is the first and unique implant in the world manufactured through a direct laser metal forming technique by microfusion of titanium particles. Introduced in on the market, it mimics the natural tooth: a perfect tooth, without screw loosening problems or complications associated with bacterial infiltrations.

This tapered implant permits to reach higher initial stability quotients due to the improved height of the threads and the helicoidal cutting sides. For more information and additional details, please visit our website www.

This implant allows us to cover the increasing necessities of our demanding clinicians. Our business model and manufacturing expertise make us ideal partners for designers and dealers alike. Adding our expert value to any stage of the supply chain for complicated products upgrades the standard and success of our customers. Mode medikal was established in as a group company of company union with experts and engineers have designed hundreds of products by academic staff.

By combining its casting and engraving expertise, MIPRO is able to provide manufacturers and vendors with components of superior quality and precision. Our vast technical know-how, product design and project management capabilities improve manufacturing procedures and result in better products. Partnering with MIPRO provides you with design support, value-added engineering, project management, logistics expertise, and reduces overheads.

MIPRO offers a boutique manufacturing approach combined with global resources and know-how without compromising personalized service and flexibility. Mode Medikal creates the difference in implantology sector by using pure water instead of industrial oil in production of implants and other sub-products for more effective sterilization.

We maintain the success in innovation structure by production only one screwdriver for all superstructures of implants, that provides the comfortable usage for our dentists.Kamoto, Y. Impurity specification and justification. Impurities which are not increased in stability studies and not formed during forced degradation studies are considered as process related impurities.

In the period evaluated, The self-tapping narrow body Atlas implants are then inserted through the gingiva to the correct depth.